Sensitivity analysis var name #300
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
problem which includes the variable name and the variable value to the sensitivity analysis
![github-actions[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/15368?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
tests/test_sensitivity_analysis.py
Outdated
Comment on lines
180
to
183
| "num_vars": 2, | ||
| "names": ["c", "v0"], | ||
| "bounds": [(-5.0, 1.0), (0.0, 1000.0)], | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
[blackfmt] reported by reviewdog 🐶
Suggested change
| "num_vars": 2, | |
| "names": ["c", "v0"], | |
| "bounds": [(-5.0, 1.0), (0.0, 1000.0)], | |
| } | |
| "num_vars": 2, | |
| "names": ["c", "v0"], | |
| "bounds": [(-5.0, 1.0), (0.0, 1000.0)], | |
| } |
tests/test_sensitivity_analysis.py
Outdated
Comment on lines
191
to
194
| "num_vars": 2, | ||
| "names": ["c", "v0"], | ||
| "bounds": [(-5.0, 1.0), (0.0, 1000.0)], | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
[blackfmt] reported by reviewdog 🐶
Suggested change
| "num_vars": 2, | |
| "names": ["c", "v0"], | |
| "bounds": [(-5.0, 1.0), (0.0, 1000.0)], | |
| } | |
| "num_vars": 2, | |
| "names": ["c", "v0"], | |
| "bounds": [(-5.0, 1.0), (0.0, 1000.0)], | |
| } |
Coverage report
Click to see where and how coverage changed
This report was generated by python-coverage-comment-action |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #300 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 94.17% 94.24% +0.07%
==========================================
Files 62 65 +3
Lines 3606 3755 +149
==========================================
+ Hits 3396 3539 +143
- Misses 210 216 +6 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
sgreenbury
reviewed
Feb 18, 2025
sgreenbury
reviewed
Feb 18, 2025
|
Thanks @marjanfamili, this looks great - I left two related suggestions above in the code. |
Co-authored-by: Sam Greenbury <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Sam Greenbury <[email protected]>
sgreenbury
reviewed
Feb 18, 2025
Co-authored-by: Sam Greenbury <[email protected]>
sgreenbury
approved these changes
Feb 18, 2025
|
@all-contributors add @sgreenbury for code, ideas, review, projectManagement |
|
I've put up a pull request to add @sgreenbury! 🎉 |
Use SALib ResultDict.to_df() function to provide results in pandas dataframe format
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR addresses #279